Universität Wien
LV-Leiter*in:
Anglistik
LV-Titel:
1.1 At the beginning of the course, the learning outcomes, content and assessment criteria were explained in sufficient detail.
I strongly agree
I strongly disagree
1.2 The lecturer is very motivating.
1.3 I am able to explain the most important content from this course to less advanced students in a comprehensible and clear manner.
1.4 The University of Vienna strives to combat discrimination. If there were situations of any kind of discriminatory behaviour (for example, on the basis of gender, ethnicity, religion or belief, age or sexual orientation) in the course, please describe them here:
1.5 To complete this course, students have an intended workload of X hours (X ECTS credits). In your opinion: Will you invest more or less hours to complete this course?
much more
much less
1.6 Optional: Please specify why you will invest more/less hours than intended:
1.7 Please specify why you will invest less hours than intended:
1.8 Overall, I would rate the course as
very good
very bad
2.1 I am studying in the:
2.2 The course is well organized.
2.3 The course content is well prepared from a didactic point of view.
2.4 With regard to the specifications of the curriculum (ECTS credits), the total workload is
too low
too high
2.5 I actively contribute to discussions and in-class work.
2.6 The course allows space for critical thinking and discussion.
The lecturer/group leader ...
2.7 ... is well prepared for the individual sessions.
2.8 ... presents the material in an intelligible fashion.
2.9 ... provides intelligible answers to the students' questions.
2.10 ... facilitates a positive working atmosphere.
2.11 ... is fair and correct in his/her dealings with the students.
2.12 ... is available for advice outside the classroom (office hours, email, after class …).
2.13 I have actively sought feedback from the lecturer.
2.14 I have received constructive feedback on my performance during the semester.
3.1 The course syllabus as well as content and organization of the course were communicated clearly.
3.2 The lecturer was able to adjust their teaching to the online format.
3.3 Teacher input and student interaction phases were distributed well.
3.4 If not, what kind of interaction would you have liked to have more often?
3.5 Please comment on the online format, use of online tools and online communication. Do you have any suggestions for improvement?
3.6 Are there any parts of the course that you would have preferred to have on site? Are there any parts we should consider to keep online in the future?
4.1 What is particularly good/bad about the course?
4.2 Is there a question you would like to add to the questionnaire?
Lizenziert an Universität Wien - evasys V8.2 (2291) - Copyright © 2021 evasys GmbH. Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
